home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: mforget@elfhaven.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Michel Forget)
- Subject: Re: LTMF and dialog standards?
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 1994 12:33:32 -0600
- Precedence: bulk
-
- Hello Ken,
-
- [KH>> "The GEM-List Standard was approved by a group of XXX developers, on
- [KH>> XX/XX/XX. It embodies the..." [provide some interesting trivia about
- [KH>> the GEM-List here).
- [KH>
- [KH>Why describe when it was created? Just explain what the standards are, and
- [KH>which level your program complies to? Why not make things *SIMPLE*? This
- [KH>was the way that things were MEANT to be, right?
-
- Background information is nice; having a short note about when it was
- ratified and how many people were on the list to help create it would
- give the user a sense of validity to the proposal. It is much more
- credible to say "100 developers support this" than "I support this"... :)
-
-
- --
- Michel Forget \\ mforget@elfhaven.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca //
- Electric Storm Software \\ ess@tibalt.supernet.ab.ca //
- PGP Public Key Finger. = 1F C0 D3 FE 40 51 7F 47 F3 4A C6 A0 6E 02 71 85
-